AB 1920: California bill goes beyond Net Metering

Requires California Utilities to pay for excess solar electric (and wind) power generation.

Under the California Solar Initiative (CSI), net metering limits your electric bill to near zero even if your photovoltaic system generates more power than you consume. AB 1920 corrects this situation by forcing utilities to compensate photovoltaic system owners for any excess solar electric power generated. In effect, the electric bill can go negative with a credit for the system owner.

AB 1920 is a bill authored by California Assembly member Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) as a result of entries by his constituents in the 2008 “There Oughta to be a Law” contest (see Huffman Watch: Our Assemblyman at Work). AB 1920 can be summarized as follows:

AB 1920 (Huffman): Renewable Energy Incentives – Net Metering
Enables residents who produce renewable energy for their homes, small businesses or farms to get paid by their utility company for any excess electricity they produce that goes back on the grid. Level of compensation to be determined by the Public Utilities Commission. Provides utilities with Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) credits for purchasing the renewable energy from their customers. Removes the “size to load” restriction in state law that limits energy customers’ ability to “supersize” their solar electricity systems.

Here are the key reasons why AB 1920 is needed to again patch the excessive complexity and loopholes of the CSI:

• Net metering discourages electricity conservation and encourages California consumers to waste their solar electricity until their negative accounts hit zero.
• The “size to load” restriction rewards electricity wasters with a history of high electric consumption while valuable roof area and lower per watt installation costs are forgone at frugal electricity consumers.
• Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs) can claim California Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) credits for purchasing excess solar electric power from system owners.

However, AB 1920 should be amended to apply to municipal utilities as well as IOUs like PG&E Corporation.

The compensation rate for excess power under AB 1920 will be determined by the California Public Utilities Commission.

Per Assembly member Huffman’s staff, AB 1920 passed out of the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce (10-2 vote or see Two Huffman Renewable Energy Bills Approved in Committee) and the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources (7-2 vote). AB 1920 next moves to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations where it is expected to “be heard in May”.

Here is the latest amended version of Assembly Bill No. 1920. Further background is available in Cashing in on your solar savings by Matt Nauman with The Mercury News.

Thanks to all the folks who expressed concern and wished me a swift recovery per my previous post, GUNTHER Portfolio Hiatus.

What will you do for Earth Day '08? (credit to http://orangescale.net/)

California Solar Initiative: No solar home installations “completed” yet in 2007

CSI should examine the Evidence of problems beyond Time of Use Rates

In The Monterey County Herald Guest commentary, Dale Julin reports STATE SOLAR PROJECT SHADY: Stalled initiative squeezing smaller companies.

As recent as May 21, 2007, the CSI & SGIP Statewide Average Systems Costs (May 2007) (downloadable Excel file) proves no CSI Residential or Commercial system installations have been completed in 2007. Don’t be deceived by the Statistics sheet; this includes prior year data despite the title.

Beyond the publicized Time of Use issue I mentioned at the end of California Clean Tech Open 2007 Kick-off Event Wrap up, solar installers are finding the new rebate application process novel like compared to the previous single page rebate form. For example, there are now two 2-Step instruction forms, 2-Step Application Process and 2-Step Forms and Documentation Requirements, describing the general procedure to apply and obtain solar rebates or Expected Performance Based Buydown (EPBB) incentives for residential and business installations smaller than 10kWp (kilowatt – peak).

The EPBB incentive for a particular project is determined by a complex set of rules evaluating the system components, design, and the installation implementation. Although these rules are intended to guarantee customers robust and optimal performance systems, strict adherence to these rules can maximize the EPBB incentive while the solar electric system is setup for maximum summer electricity generation at the expense of higher annual production.

The myriad of paperwork required for an incentive application can be viewed on the PG&E Corporation site at 2007 CSI Handbook and Forms CSI Forms or take a look at the CSI Handbook.

I noticed Mr. Julin’s article today courtesy of Google Alerts (Google Account not required) I have set up for the keywords Solar and Photovoltaic. If you thought this post was about that other CSI, you can visit the Official CSI:WIKI instead.